About
Thin Client Technology
Advantages Of Thin Client Networks
Lower IT admin costs. Thin clients are managed almost entirely
at the server, the hardware has less points of failure, and the
local environment is highly restricted (and often stateless), thereby
providing protection from malware loading and executing.
Easier to secure. Thin clients can be designed so that no application
data ever resides on the client (it is entirely rendered) so that
malware protection is centralized.
Lower hardware costs. Thin client hardware is generally cheaper
because it does not contain a disk, application memory, or a powerful
processor. They also generally have a longer period before requiring
an upgrade or becoming obsolete.
Note: A thick or fat client does as much processing as possible
and passes only data required for communications and archival storage
to the server.
Advantages Of Thick Client Networks
Less network bandwidth. Thick clients typically require less network
bandwidth.
Less server requirements. A thick client server does not require
as high of performance as a thin client server (since the thick
clients themselves do much of the application processing).
Better multimedia performance. Thick clients have advantages in
multimedia-rich applications that would be bandwidth intensive if
fully served. For example, thick clients are well suited for video
gaming.
Examples
Of Thin Client & Thick Client Usage |
|
The advocates of both architectures tend to have contentious
relationships. In practice, there seems to be little to choose
between the two approaches for many applications. A few situations
may clearly call for one or the other. Distributed computing
projects such as the SETI@home project (whose whole point
is to pass off computationally intensive analysis to a large
collection of remote computers) are applications that require
thick clients. On the other hand multicasting entertainment
or educational material to a number of clients might best
be done with thin clients since exactly the same material
is to be presented at each.
|
|